Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 303
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 17(3): e0264921, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35303009

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To identify preferred burnout interventions within a resident physician population, utilizing the Nominal Group Technique. The results will be used to design a discrete choice experiment study to inform the development of resident burnout prevention programs. METHODS: Three resident focus groups met (10-14 participants/group) to prioritize a list of 23 factors for burnout prevention programs. The Nominal Group Technique consisted of three steps: an individual, confidential ranking of the 23 factors by importance from 1 to 23, a group discussion of each attribute, including a group review of the rankings, and an opportunity to alter the original ranking across participants. RESULTS: The total number of residents (36) were a representative sample of specialty, year of residency, and sex. There was strong agreement about the most highly rated attributes which grouped naturally into themes of autonomy, meaning, competency and relatedness. There was also disagreement on several of the attributes that is likely due to the differences in residency specialty and subsequently rotation requirements. CONCLUSION: This study identified the need to address multiple organizational factors that may lead to physician burnout. There is a clear need for complex interventions that target systemic and program level factors rather than focus on individual interventions. These results may help residency program directors understand the specific attributes of a burnout prevention program valued by residents. Aligning burnout interventions with resident preferences could improve the efficacy of burnout prevention programs by improving adoption of, and satisfaction with, these programs. Physician burnout is a work-related syndrome characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a sense of reduced personal accomplishment [1]. Burnout is present in epidemic proportions and was estimated to occur in over 50 percent of practicing physicians and in up to 89 percent of resident physicians pre-COVID 19. The burnout epidemic is growing; a recent national survey of US physicians reported an 8.9 percent increase in burnout between 2011 and 2014 [2]. Rates of physician burnout have also increased [3] during the COVID-19 pandemic with a new classification of "pandemic burnout" experienced by over 52 percent of healthcare workers as early as June of 2020 [4]. Physician burnout can lead to depression, suicidal ideation, and relationship problems that may progress to substance abuse, increased interpersonal conflicts, broken relationships, low quality of life, major depression, and suicide [5-7]. The estimated rate of physician suicide is 300-400 annually [8-10].


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional/prevención & control , Médicos/psicología , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Atención Plena , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Higiene del Sueño , Apoyo Social
3.
Acad Med ; 97(2): 271-277, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34647919

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Postgraduate training programs are incorporating feedback from registered nurses (RNs) to facilitate holistic assessments of resident performance. RNs are a potentially rich source of feedback because they often observe trainees during clinical encounters when physician supervisors are not present. However, RN perspectives about sharing feedback have not been deeply explored. This study investigated RN perspectives about providing feedback and explored the facilitators and barriers influencing their engagement. METHOD: Constructivist grounded theory methodology was used in interviewing 11 emergency medicine and 8 internal medicine RNs at 2 campuses of a tertiary care academic medical center in Ontario, Canada, between July 2019 and March 2020. Interviews explored RN experiences working with and observing residents in clinical practice. Data collection and analysis were conducted iteratively. Themes were identified using constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: RNs felt they could observe authentic day-to-day behaviors of residents often unwitnessed by supervising physicians and offer unique feedback related to patient advocacy, communication, leadership, collaboration, and professionalism. Despite a strong desire to contribute to resident education, RNs were apprehensive about sharing feedback and reported barriers related to hierarchy, power differentials, and a fear of overstepping professional boundaries. Although infrequent, a key stimulus that enabled RNs to feel safe in sharing feedback was an invitation from the supervising physician to provide input. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived hierarchy in academic medicine is a critical barrier to engaging RNs in feedback for residents. Accessing RN feedback on authentic resident behaviors requires dismantling the negative effects of hierarchy and fostering a collaborative interprofessional working environment. A critical step toward this goal may require supervising physicians to model feedback-seeking behavior by inviting RNs to share feedback. Until a workplace culture is established that validates nurses' input and creates safe opportunities for them to contribute to resident education, the voices of nurses will remain unheard.


Asunto(s)
Retroalimentación Formativa , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ontario
4.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 21(1): 302, 2021 Apr 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33853540

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vacuum-assisted birth is not widely practiced in Tanzania but efforts to re-introduce the procedure suggest some success. Few studies have targeted childbirth attendants to learn how their perceptions of and training experiences with the procedure affect practice. This study explores a largely rural cohort of health providers to determine associations between recent practice of the procedure and training, individual and contextual factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional knowledge, attitudes and practice survey of 297 providers was conducted in 2019 at 3 hospitals and 12 health centers that provided comprehensive emergency obstetric care. We used descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression to model the probability of having performed a vacuum extraction in the last 3 months. RESULTS: Providers were roughly split between working in maternity units in hospitals and health centers. They included: medical doctors, assistant medical officers (14%); clinical officers (10%); nurse officers, assistant nurse officers, registered nurses (32%); and enrolled nurses (44%). Eighty percent reported either pre-service, in-service vacuum extraction training or both, but only 31% reported conducting a vacuum-assisted birth in the last 3 months. Based on 11 training and enabling factors, a positive association with recent practice was observed; the single most promising factor was hands-on solo practice during in-service training (66% of providers with this experience had conducted vacuum extraction in the last 3 months). The logistic regression model showed that providers exposed to 7-9 training modalities were 7.8 times more likely to have performed vacuum extraction than those exposed to fewer training opportunities (AOR = 7.78, 95% CI: 4.169-14.524). Providers who worked in administrative councils other than Kigoma Municipality were 2.7 times more likely to have conducted vacuum extraction than their colleagues in Kigoma Municipality (AOR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.023-6.976). Similarly, providers posted in a health center compared to those in a hospital were twice as likely to have conducted a recent vacuum extraction (AOR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.153-3.850), and finally, male providers were twice as likely as their female colleagues to have performed this procedure recently (AOR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.072-3.55). CONCLUSIONS: Training and location of posting were associated with recent practice of vacuum extraction. Multiple training modalities appear to predict recent practice but hands-on experience during training may be the most critical component. We recommend a low-dose high frequency strategy to skills building with simulation and e-learning. A gender integrated approach to training may help ensure female trainees are exposed to critical training components.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Extracción Obstétrica por Aspiración/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Instrucción por Computador , Estudios Transversales , Educación Médica Continua , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Partería/educación , Embarazo , Entrenamiento Simulado , Tanzanía , Extracción Obstétrica por Aspiración/educación , Adulto Joven
5.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 32(6): 1527-1535, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33827902

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Older patients with advanced CKD are at high risk for serious complications and death, yet few discuss advance care planning (ACP) with their kidney clinicians. Examining barriers and facilitators to ACP among such patients might help identify patient-centered opportunities for improvement. METHODS: In semistructured interviews in March through August 2019 with purposively sampled patients (aged ≥70 years, CKD stages 4-5, nondialysis), care partners, and clinicians at clinics in across the United States, participants described discussions, factors contributing to ACP completion or avoidance, and perceived value of ACP. We used thematic analysis to analyze data. RESULTS: We conducted 68 semistructured interviews with 23 patients, 19 care partners, and 26 clinicians. Only seven of 26 (27%) clinicians routinely discussed ACP. About half of the patients had documented ACP, mostly outside the health care system. We found divergent ACP definitions and perspectives; kidney clinicians largely defined ACP as completion of formal documentation, whereas patients viewed it more holistically, wanting discussions about goals, prognosis, and disease trajectory. Clinicians avoided ACP with patients from minority groups, perceiving cultural or religious barriers. Four themes and subthemes informing variation in decisions to discuss ACP and approaches emerged: (1) role ambiguity and responsibility for ACP, (2) questioning the value of ACP, (3) confronting institutional barriers (time, training, reimbursement, and the electronic medical record, EMR), and (4) consequences of avoiding ACP (disparities in ACP access and overconfidence that patients' wishes are known). CONCLUSIONS: Patients, care partners, and clinicians hold discordant views about the responsibility for discussing ACP and the scope for it. This presents critical barriers to the process, leaving ACP insufficiently discussed with older adults with advanced CKD.


Asunto(s)
Planificación Anticipada de Atención , Comunicación , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Prioridad del Paciente , Rol del Médico , Médicos , Adulto , Planificación Anticipada de Atención/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Cuidadores , Educación Médica , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Entrevistas como Asunto , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Minoritarios , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Médicos/economía , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
6.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform ; 5: 394-400, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33822651

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: COVID-19 has infected more than 94 million people worldwide and caused more than 2 million deaths. Patients with cancer are at significantly increased risk compared with the general population. Telemedicine represents a common strategy to prevent viral spread. We sought to evaluate patient with cancer and physician perceptions of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A 16-question survey was e-mailed to 1,843 active e-mails of patients presenting to one of the six cancer clinics at a comprehensive cancer care center from January 1, 2020, to June 1, 2020. A six-question survey was e-mailed to attending physicians of those clinics. Specialties included Medical Oncology, Hematology-Oncology, Surgical Oncology, Urological Oncology, and Gynecologic Oncology. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-four patients (20.3%) and 14 physicians (66.7%) responded. Most (68.2%) currently prefer in-person visits, and 80.4% prefer in-person visits following pandemic resolution. More than half (52.2%) of patients preferring virtual visits do so because of convenience. Most (63.1%) patients with cancer are comfortable with a complete physical examination. Surgical patients are more likely to prefer a complete examination (P = .0476). Physicians prefer in-person visits (64.2%) and believe that virtual visits maybe or probably do not provide comparable care (64.2%). 71.4% believe that virtual visits help prevent the spread of infectious disease. CONCLUSION: Given preferences for in-person visits, cancer care teams should be prepared to continue providing in-person visits for many of their patients. The discrepancy between patient and provider concern for spread of infectious disease represents an area where patients may benefit from increased education. Providers should feel comfortable performing physical examinations at their own discretion.


Asunto(s)
Actitud , COVID-19/prevención & control , Oncología Médica/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Telemedicina/métodos , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Humanos , Internet , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Pandemias , Pacientes/psicología , Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/psicología , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
J Health Care Chaplain ; 27(2): 84-104, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31179903

RESUMEN

Attending to patient religion and spirituality (R/S) generates controversy. Some worry that because physicians lack formal religious training they may overstep their expertise, while others argue that physicians who are attentive to patient R/S provide higher quality of care. We aimed to describe American Muslim physicians' perspectives and practices regarding R/S discussions, and how physician characteristics correlate with these.A questionnaire including measures of religiosity, empathy, and attitudes and behaviors toward R/S, was randomly administered to Islamic Medical Association of North America members.More empathetic physicians were more likely to inquire about patients' R/S, share their own religious ideas and experiences, and encourage patients in their own R/S beliefs and practices (ß = .44, p < .01). More empathetic physicians also had greater odds of encouraging discontinuation of futile life-sustaining interventions (OR 1.90, p < .05). Additionally, respondents with higher empathy had greater odds of encouraging patients at the end-of-life to seek reconciliation with God (OR 3.27, p < .001), and seek the forgiveness of those they have wronged (OR 2.48, p < .001).In the context of R/S diversity among the patient and provider population, enhancing physician empathy may be key to attending to the health-related R/S needs of patients.


Asunto(s)
Empatía , Islamismo , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Médicos/psicología , Espiritualidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
9.
Acupunct Med ; 39(4): 309-317, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33300369

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The degree to which the effects of acupuncture treatment vary between acupuncturists is unknown. We used a large individual patient dataset of trials of acupuncture for chronic pain to assess practitioner heterogeneity. METHODS: Individual patient data linked to identifiable acupuncturists were drawn from a dataset of 39 high-quality trials of acupuncture, where the comparators were either sham acupuncture or non-acupuncture controls, such as standard care or waitlist. Heterogeneity among acupuncturists was assessed by meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1206 acupuncturists in 13 trials were included. Statistically significant heterogeneity was found in trials with sham-control groups (p < 0.0001) and non-acupuncture control groups (p <0.0001). However, the degree of heterogeneity was very small, with the observed distribution of treatment effects virtually overlapping that expected by chance. For instance, for non-acupuncture-controlled trials, the proportion of acupuncturists with effect sizes half a standard deviation greater or less than average was expected to be 34%, but was observed to be 37%. A limitation is that the trials included a relatively limited range of acupuncturists, mainly physician-acupuncturists. DISCUSSION: Although differences in effects between acupuncturists were greater than expected by chance, the degree of variation was small. This suggests that most chronic pain patients in clinical practice would have similar results to those reported in high-quality trials; comparably, we did not find evidence to suggest that greater standardization of acupuncture practice would improve outcomes. Further research needs to be conducted exploring variability using a sample of acupuncturists with a broader range of practice styles, training and experience.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Médicos/normas , Terapia por Acupuntura/psicología , Terapia por Acupuntura/normas , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Médicos/psicología , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0244221, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33332406

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Midwives and obstetricians are key maternity care providers; they are the most trusted source of information regarding nutrition and gestational weight gain. However, their views, practices and perceived barriers to managing pregnancy related weight gain have not been studied in Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to explore midwives' and obstetricians' observations and perspectives about gestational weight gain and postpartum weight management in Ethiopia. METHODS: We conducted face-to-face interviews with 11 midwives and 10 obstetricians, from January 2019 to March 2019. All interview data were transcribed verbatim. We analysed the data using thematic analysis with an inductive approach. RESULTS: We identified three themes and associated subthemes. Midwives and obstetricians had limited knowledge of the optimal gestational weight gain. Almost all participants were unaware of the presence of the Institute of Medicine recommendations for optimal weight gain in pregnancy. According to the study participants, women in Ethiopia do not want to gain weight during pregnancy, but do want to gain weight after the birth. Counselling about gestational weight gain and postpartum weight management was not routinely provided for pregnant women. This is mostly because gestational weight gain counselling was not considered to be a priority by maternity care providers in Ethiopia. CONCLUSIONS: The limited knowledge of and low attention to pregnancy related weight management by midwives and obstetricians in this setting needs appropriate intervention. Adapting a guideline for pregnancy weight management and integrating it into antenatal care is essential.


Asunto(s)
Ganancia de Peso Gestacional , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Etiopía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
Chiropr Man Therap ; 28(1): 55, 2020 10 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33092605

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chiropractors are a particular subset of health care professionals that reportedly suffer occupational musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), yet they have received minimal attention to date regarding mitigating risks of occupational injury. Our study determined the prevalence of occupationally-related MSDs in the preceding year, their bodily distribution, severity, and practice-related changes in practicing chiropractors in the province of Ontario. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of chiropractors who were members of the Ontario Chiropractic Association (OCA) from January to March 2019. A three-part online survey was developed to ask chiropractors about specific details of MSDs they experienced in the past year and any practice-related changes they made as a result. Responses from participants provided both quantitative and qualitative data. Prevalence estimates were derived for quantitative data. Qualitative data were stratified by themes that were further divided into categories and subcategories. Demographic variables of the respondents and OCA membership were compared to determine representativeness. RESULTS: From the 432 responses (11.8% response rate), 59.1% reported experiencing an occupationally-related MSD in the past year. Survey respondents were demographically representative of the OCA membership. MSDs were most commonly reported for the lower back (38.3%), wrists/hands (38.1%) and neck (37.4%). Positioning/performing manipulation was the most common occupational activity for MSD of the upper extremity (53.1%) and lower back (34.8%). Chiropractors largely reported their MSDs did not prevent them from doing their normal work (77.4%), despite the fact that 43.2% reported experiencing their MSDs for more than 30 days in the previous year. Common reported work modifications were grouped under themes of practice and physical changes. Practice changes included reducing patient volume, hiring personnel and scheduling. Physical changes included using different office equipment, selecting different techniques requiring lower force and altering their hand contacts or body position when treating patients. CONCLUSIONS: One-year prevalence of occupational MSDs from this study are comparable to previously reported estimates in chiropractors. These data suggest that chiropractors continue with their regular workload despite their MSDs, thereby increasing their chances of presenteeism. Chiropractors changing technique or technique parameters due to their MSDs provides direction for future research to reduce exposure to occupational MSD risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Quiropráctica/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Ontario/epidemiología , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Carga de Trabajo
12.
Chiropr Man Therap ; 28(1): 49, 2020 09 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32951611

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Better understanding of the dynamics and temporal changes in manual therapy service utilisation may assist with healthcare planning and resource allocation. The objectives of this study were to quantify, describe, and compare service utilisation trends in the manual therapy professions within the Australian private healthcare setting between 2008 and 2017. METHODS: Data regarding the number of services, total cost, and benefits paid were extracted for each manual therapy profession (i.e. chiropractic, osteopathy, and physiotherapy) for the period 2008-2017 from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. The number of registered providers for each profession were obtained from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. Descriptive statistics were produced for two time periods (i.e. 2008-2012 and 2013-2017) for each manual therapy profession. Annual percentage change during each time period was estimated by fitting Poisson regression models. Test for the equality of regression coefficients was used to compare the trends in the two time periods within each profession, and to compare the trends across professions within a time period. RESULTS: A cumulative total of 198.6 million manual therapy services with a total cost of $12.8 billion was provided within the Australian private healthcare setting between 2008 and 2017. Although service utilisation and total cost increased throughout the ten-year period, the annual growth was significantly lower during 2013-2017 than 2008-2012. Whereas osteopathy and physiotherapy experienced significant annual growth in the number of services and total cost during 2013-2017, negative growth in the number of services was observed for chiropractic during the same period. The annual number of services per provider declined significantly for chiropractic and physiotherapy between 2013 and 2017. CONCLUSION: Service provision under private health insurance general treatment cover constitute a major source of revenue for manual therapy professions in Australia. Although manual therapy service utilisation increased throughout the ten-year period from 2008 to 2017, the annual growth declined. There were diverging trends across the three professions, including significantly greater decline in annual growth for chiropractic than for osteopathy and physiotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Manipulaciones Musculoesqueléticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Australia , Quiropráctica/economía , Quiropráctica/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Manipulaciones Musculoesqueléticas/economía , Manipulaciones Musculoesqueléticas/tendencias , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(32): e21495, 2020 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32769885

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between doctor-shopping behavior and clinical conditions, and to clearly outline the effects of both the number of clinic visits and the number of doctor changes on patients' health conditions. Data from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2004 was collected from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. After randomly selecting one million people, we extracted 5-year longitudinal data, about the number of clinic visits, number of doctor changes, and changes in self-health status for each patient with diabetes over the age of 18. We developed a relationship among the variables by using the generalized estimating equation. The results revealed that the number of clinic visits on the change of health status is a U curve, suggesting that health condition could be optimal with an appropriate number of clinic visits. The effect of the number of doctor changes is linearly correlated with health deterioration. The results suggest that disease conditions can only be controlled with an adequate number of clinic visits. Excessively frequent clinic visits are not only unfavorable to patients' health status but are also wasteful of limited medical resources. For diabetic mellitus patients, the more they change doctors, the worse their health status. All of these results are important for patients to stay healthy and to save medical resources.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria/psicología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taiwán
14.
Acupunct Med ; 38(5): 319-326, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32538101

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An introductory acupuncture course has been offered to primary health care physicians and family medicine residents in southern Brazil since 2011. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the profile of acupuncture utilization of primary care physicians who completed an introductory course of acupuncture between 2011 and 2018. METHOD: A survey using an electronic questionnaire was sent to all 119 physicians who completed the course. RESULTS: Fifty-five physicians answered the questionnaire. The majority of them reported continuation of the practice of acupuncture in scheduled appointments and on spontaneous demand. The most commonly used principles of point selection were traditional acupuncture point function, myofascial trigger point needling and point protocols. As barriers to the practice of acupuncture, time limitation and inadequate physical space were predominant. The participants described the problem-solving potential of the procedure and good patient acceptance as facilitators. The most common problems treated with acupuncture were musculoskeletal pain, and mood and anxiety disorders. A reduction in referrals to specialists and reduced prescription of pain medications were also reported. Most physicians answered that they often combined acupuncture with other medications or associated acupuncture with other complementary practices. The main adverse events reported by the participants were vascular trauma and fainting. CONCLUSION: Most primary care physicians who completed the introductory course and answered the survey still used acupuncture in their routine, primarily for the management of musculoskeletal conditions and mental health conditions. These physicians reported reductions in specialist referrals and prescription of pain medication after integrating basic acupuncture skills into primary care practice.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura , Acupuntura/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos de Atención Primaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Acupuntura/educación , Puntos de Acupuntura , Terapia por Acupuntura/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Brasil , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos de Atención Primaria/educación , Adulto Joven
15.
Fam Syst Health ; 38(2): 172-183, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32525351

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Primary care is a common access point for children and adolescents with depression and suicidality concerns. In this setting, pediatricians typically function as front-line providers given barriers that patients face in accessing mental health clinicians. METHOD: This study surveyed chief residents from all pediatric residency programs in the United States (N = 214) to evaluate (a) their attitudes, knowledge, practices, and comfort in managing depression and suicidality concerns in primary care, and (b) the relationship between residency training processes and pediatric residents' practices, knowledge, and comfort related to identifying and managing depression and suicidality. RESULTS: The usable response rate was 37.6%. The large majority of respondents are involved in evaluation and management of depression and suicidality; yet many respondents reported a lack of knowledge and comfort in these roles. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for pediatric residency program training processes are discussed, including the potential added value of colocating mental health clinicians into the primary care continuity training clinic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).


Asunto(s)
Depresión/clasificación , Médicos/psicología , Suicidio/clasificación , Adulto , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Depresión/psicología , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Pediatría/métodos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación Cualitativa , Suicidio/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
16.
Complement Ther Clin Pract ; 39: 101144, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32379632

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the attitudes of Turkish physicians toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). METHODS: This mixed-method study was carried out on Turkish physicians (n = 103). Eight participants were personally interviewed in detail. The attitudes of the physicians were obtained after the quantitative phase and were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Data were collected using the Holistic Complementary and Alternative Health Questionnaire (HCAMQ), and socio-demographics. RESULTS: The mean HCAMQ scores were 34.98 ± 4.65. Prevailing themes were: (1) the placement of CAM in medicine, (2) unclear aspects of CAM, (3) underlying factors of attitudes toward CAM, (4) acceptance of CAM subject to conditions, (5) reactions to CAM usage, and (6) popular CAM approaches and their positive effects. CONCLUSION: The majority of physicians were skeptical about CAM but reported being non-judgmental toward patients that had used CAM. However, they also highlighted that considering evidence-based outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Turquía , Adulto Joven
17.
Complement Ther Clin Pract ; 40: 101175, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32347211

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This survey aimed to investigate clinicians' perceptions and current practice patterns of Korean medicine (KM) treatment for female infertility. METHODS: A questionnaire on clinical practice patterns of KM treatment for female infertility was constructed and distributed to 703 KM doctors (KMDs). RESULTS: A total of 20.5% of physicians (n = 144/703) completed the survey and delivered integrative care for female infertility patients. Integrative care mainly consisted of acupuncture, herbal medicine, and moxibustion. The participants largely relied on radiological findings on ultrasonography and hormone tests for diagnosis. The most frequently prescribed herbal medication was Jogyeongjongok-tang (Tiaojing Zhongyu decoction), and the most frequently applied acupoints were SP6, CV4 and ST36. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides expert opinions and information on actual clinical practice patterns of KM for treating female infertility. However, we cannot completely discount the possibility that biased selection of subjects and the low response rate limit the interpretations of the study results.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Fitoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Puntos de Acupuntura , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , República de Corea , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
18.
Birth ; 47(4): 322-331, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32253784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) is a modifiable risk factor associated with maternal and infant health, and pregnancy outcomes. However, several factors influence the provision of health promotion advice including professional knowledge. This review aims to summarize published evidence relating to midwives' and obstetricians' knowledge of GWG guidelines. METHODS: Electronic database searches were carried out using EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database. English-language studies and quantitative results were included. Identified studies were screened by two authors independently. Disagreements were discussed with a third reviewer. A review protocol was submitted for registration with PROSPERO in May 2019. RESULTS: From 10 960 records identified in preliminary searches, 12 studies reporting on 2652 midwives and obstetricians collectively were included. All studies were conducted in high-income countries. Synthesis of data was difficult as guidelines and methods for assessing knowledge varied. Midwives were mainly reported as the leading participant, with limited data available on obstetrician knowledge. Both groups demonstrated insufficient knowledge of GWG guidelines. Self-reported knowledge was significantly higher than those assessed by direct knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights a substantial gap in health care professionals' knowledge of GWG guideline content which needs to be addressed. Differences between professionals' direct knowledge and self-reported knowledge are important for clinical practice as it may inhibit the provision of evidence-based advice. It is important to accurately assess knowledge in this area to develop further training for midwives and obstetricians to improve health promotion during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Ganancia de Peso Gestacional , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Autoinforme
20.
Undersea Hyperb Med ; 47(1): 39-50, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32176945

RESUMEN

Hyperbaric medicine is a relatively young specialty that remains in the blind spot of most doctors' awareness. This study endeavors to identify the level of awareness of the indications for hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy among a doctor population in a developed country and factors which may improve referral rates. An anonymized questionnaire was distributed to doctors licensed to practice in Malta. Questions included physician specialty, demographics and previous exposure to diving and/or hyperbaric medicine. Moreover, two scoring systems were used to score subjects on HBO2-related topics. Binomial logistic regression models and generalized linear models were used in the statistical analysis. A total of 152 full replies were obtained and analyzed. Respondents who had visited a hyperbaric unit (HBU) (p=0.002) or attended a lecture on HBO2 (p=0.006) scored better than their counterparts, indicating better awareness of HBO2 indications and local chamber location. A previous HBU visit (p=0.001), being a hospital-based doctor (p=0.027) and a history of scuba diving (p=0.03) were associated with willingness to refer patients for HBO2 in the future. Encouraging visits to an HBU has been shown to be associated with multiple factors, which are expected to result in improved referral rates. Targeted educational sessions to doctors and medical students are likely to be beneficial in improving correct referral of patients for HBO2. The findings from this study may prove useful in improving appropriate referral rates of patients who may benefit from this useful treatment modality.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Malta
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA